![]() All these political conflict resulted to wrong decision making which involved launching the shuttle despite the danger involved. NASA enhanced heavy schedule on the shuttle construction which Thiokol engineers disapproved. They considered it as a hindrance to attain their goals. This made NASA ignore the safety warning provided by the engineers. NASA had a deadline to beat and they were not ready to back off. They were still not convinced that the machine was safe enough to be launched. Thiokol engineers on the other hand were responsible of the construction of the space shuttle and they had for a longtime had a problem with the O-ring. They looked forward to the day they would launch their first space shuttle. NASA had a goal to accomplish which they wanted to attain at whatever cost. The inter-organizational politics between NASA and Thiokol was the main cause of poor decision making in the organization, which eventually resulted to the shuttle accident. Impact of Inter-Organization Politics between NASA and Thiokol Engineers This eventually resulted to a disaster (Ufuk & Nejat, 2015). Engineers lacked power the power to stop the launching, while the management used their power to ignore engineers warning. They used various excuses such as there was no such communication on 27 th of January and thus, they had not managed to stop their launch mission on time. ![]() The need to fulfill their goals and not to let down the nation made them ignore the engineers warning. However, the management did not heed to the warning since it had already made its preparation in making the launch, and it was not ready to bare the shame associated with the fail. The involved engineers raised a last minute alarm on the possible danger in launching the flight as a result of a technique problem that they had a problem with for the last 8 years. The main issue in the challenger case study was whether to launch the space shuttle first flight on 28 th of January or not. This paper focuses on evaluating the involvement of politics in challenger disaster case study. In addition, effective decision making can be influenced by internal organization politics which can easily overlook various important facts, data and information, and influence the process of decision to fit their interest. Decision made in rash without the consideration of the right data and information may highly result to a number of problems which can be disastrous to some extent. This implies the process of decision making is enhanced by presence of sufficient information and data which should be thoroughly evaluated and considered before a decision is made. ![]() Effective decision making is highly enhanced by the use of the right and sufficient data. Space Shuttle Challenger Disaster Decision Making Process And Political Dynamics – Sample Answer Introductionĭecision making in an organization can highly determine the success or the failure of a process in the organization. Explain how you think managers could have prevented the failure of the space shuttle Challenger disaster.Describe the impact to the ecosystem that NASA was operating in at the time of the U.S. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |